DNS and NTP Impact on Authentication and Posture

Why Name Resolution and Time Are the Hidden Failure Domains

---

1. Why DNS and NTP Are Not “Supporting Services”

In identity-driven architectures, DNS and NTP are often treated as basic infrastructure services. In reality, they are control-plane dependencies for:

• Kerberos authentication

• LDAP directory operations

• Certificate validation (CRL / OCSP)

• RADIUS server selection

• Posture module communication

• Authorization consistency

If DNS or NTP are unstable, authentication and posture cannot be stable.

---

2. DNS: More Than Just Name Resolution

DNS affects authentication in multiple, often invisible, ways:

• Domain Controller discovery (SRV records)

• Site awareness (AD Sites & Services)

• Reverse lookups (logging, policy logic, auditing)

• Certificate revocation endpoint resolution

• Posture module connectivity

DNS latency is added to every authentication attempt, before any protocol exchange begins.

---

3. DNS Resolution in Hybrid Environments (The Real Problem)

3.1 Common Hybrid Pattern

• Single Active Directory forest

• Global DNS namespace

• Domain Controllers spread across regions

• Cisco ISE deployed in cloud

• DNS resolvers located on-prem

This design works logically, but fails architecturally.

---

4. Bad DNS Resolution Flow (Very Common)

4.1 Architecture Example

• On-prem primary site: Brazil

• Cisco ISE: Cloud (US)

• DNS resolvers: On-prem Brazil

4.2 What Happens

ISE (US)
 ↓
DNS Resolver (Brazil)
 ↓
Returns SRV records for BR DCs
 ↓
Kerberos & LDAP traffic crosses continents

4.3 Consequences

• Added RTT before authentication even starts

• Wrong DC selection

• Kerberos retries and delays

• LDAP group lookup slowness

• RADIUS retransmissions

• Authentication queues and posture delays

DNS is already injecting latency before Kerberos begins.

---

5. Split-Brain DNS: When “It Works” Is Not Enough

Split-brain DNS occurs when:

• Internal and external DNS zones differ

• Forwarders behave differently per region

• Cloud workloads resolve on-prem zones remotely

• Identity services rely on inconsistent answers

5.1 Common mistake

Cloud ISE resolving:

• AD DNS zones via on-prem forwarders

• CRL/OCSP via public resolvers

Result: unpredictable latency and behavior.

---

6. Good DNS Architecture for Hybrid Identity

6.1 Core principles

• DNS resolvers must be local to the consumer

• Cloud workloads → cloud DNS

• On-prem workloads → on-prem DNS

• Authoritative answers must be site-aware

• AD Sites & Services must align with DNS

• SRV records must reflect physical proximity

• Forwarding must be intentional

• No “default forward everything to HQ”

---

7. Good DNS Resolution Flow

7.1 Correct architecture

ISE (US)
 ↓
DNS Resolver (US)
 ↓
Returns SRV records for US DCs
 ↓
Kerberos & LDAP remain regional

7.2 Result

• Predictable RTT

• Stable Kerberos behavior

• Fast LDAP queries

• RADIUS timers respected

• Posture flows remain consistent

---

8. DNS Zones and Classification Strategy

8.1 Recommended classification model

Zone Type	Purpose
AD-integrated zones	Identity services
Site-aware SRV zones	DC / KDC locality
Internal PKI zones	CRL / OCSP resolution
External zones	Internet name resolution

8.2 Best practices

• Keep identity zones resolvable locally

• Avoid forwarding identity queries across regions

• Avoid relying on recursion to remote resolvers for critical identity paths

---

9. NTP: Time Is an Authentication Dependency

Kerberos, certificates, and logs all depend on time consistency.

Kerberos (RFC 4120) is particularly sensitive to:

• Time skew

• Clock drift

• Unstable NTP sources

Authentication can fail even when latency is low if time is wrong.

---

10. Bad NTP Design in Hybrid Environments

10.1 Common problems

• Multiple unsynchronized NTP sources

• Cloud VMs using default internet NTP

• On-prem DCs using internal stratum

• No monitoring of offset or drift

10.2 Result

• Kerberos ticket validation failures

• Certificate validity issues

• Intermittent authentication errors

• Logs that cannot be correlated

---

11. Good NTP Architecture

11.1 Design principles

• Single time authority per domain

• Clear stratum hierarchy

• Cloud and on-prem aligned

• Monitoring of offset, not just reachability

11.2 Example

External NTP (Stratum 1/2)
 ↓
On-prem authoritative DCs
 ↓
Cloud DCs and ISE nodes
 ↓
Endpoints

---

12. DNS + NTP Combined Failure Mode

12.1 The most dangerous scenario

• DNS resolves a remote DC

• NTP skew exists between regions

• Kerberos RTT increases

• Ticket validation fails intermittently

12.2 This creates

• Non-deterministic failures

• Difficult troubleshooting

• False perception of “random issues”

---

13. Impact on Posture

Posture depends on:

• Successful authentication

• Stable session lifecycle

• Reliable authorization refresh (CoA)

DNS/NTP instability leads to:

• Delayed posture evaluation

• Missed reassessment windows

• Cached posture states persisting too long

• Reduced compliance assurance

Posture silently degrades before authentication fully fails.

---

14. Troubleshooting Checklist (Practical)

14.1 DNS

• Measure DNS query time from ISE

• Validate SRV record responses per site

• Confirm resolver locality

• Check for cross-region forwarding

• Validate CRL / OCSP name resolution

14.2 NTP

• Check offset (not just sync)

• Validate same time source across regions

• Confirm DCs are authoritative

• Monitor drift over time

---

Key Takeaways

• DNS is part of the authentication path

• Resolver location matters as much as server location

• Kerberos is unforgiving with latency and time skew

• Split-brain DNS creates silent authentication debt

• Fix DNS and NTP before touching RADIUS timers

Identity fails quietly when DNS and time are wrong.

---